It’s common knowledge that fraternities are the center of the party scene on college campuses. However, in 2016, the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism felt the need to prove this.
The NIAAA used a $5 million grant to investigate the habits of college students. The study revealed exactly what we already knew: members of fraternities and sororities drink more alcohol on average than other college students.
Just know that any time you see an FBI agent in a movie or TV show, it costs you money. The FBI spends $1.5 million annually to run the “Investigative Publicity and Public Affairs Unit,” its entertainment liaison office.
The Institute of Museum and Library Services issued a $150,000 to the Oregon Museum of Science and Industry for their “How Does the Cookie Crumble?” workshop. Participants built and designed their own earthquake-resistant gingerbread houses tested them on machines replicating tremors.
While earthquakes and natural disasters have become a serious issue in recent years, we don’t think earthquake-proof gingerbread houses are the answer. Delicious, yes. But practical? Not at all. Participants even got to take home their creations.
How would you feel if we told you that your tax dollars were paying for computers to watch TV all day? Well, it’s true. The endeavor was funded by a $460,000 grant from the National Science Foundation.
The purpose was to train computers to understand and predict human behavior by binge-watching hundreds of hours of television. Unfortunately, the results were inconclusive so we gained nothing from it. But at least the computers had a good time, we guess.
According to an ABC News article, between January 2017 and September 2021, the Secret Service spent $1.4 million at Trump Organization hotels and other properties. these charges were incurred while the Secret Service was protecting President Donald Trump and his family.
At times, the Secret Service was charged five times the government rate to stay at Trump’s own hotels. We’re not saying Secret Service shouldn’t be comfortable, but maybe they shouldn’t be staying in gold plated rooms on the American peoples’ dime.
In theory, the American government supporting studies in other countries could be beneficial. But not when the purpose of the study is to get zebrafish addicted to nicotine. Then, it might just be a waste.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) gave $708,466 to researchers at the University of London Queen Mary and Westfield College to use “zebrafish to examine the effects of nicotine exposure on early development, addiction, anxiety, and learning.”
$630,000 to buy Facebook likes? That’s some expensive ego-stroking, but the State Department thought it would be worth it. They spent that much on in-site advertising to enhance their online presence.
Instead, less than 2% of users bothered to like or favorite their posts. The investment did not have any return, and only made the State Department look foolish. Who knows, maybe they should spend tax payer money on things that actually benefit the public.
The NIH dropped $5 million trying to convince hipsters not to smoke, banking on their love for quirky art and indie tunes. Cigarettes are bad, but apparently, taxpayer-funded koozies and T-shirts are fine.
They even created a group called “Commune” to throw non-smoking parties. Because clearly, if anything can end smoking, it’s an overpriced art show. Spoiler alert: the public wasn’t moved.
The Super Bowl is a great place to advertise because most of the country is glued to their television at the same time. The Census Bureau knew this and decided to spent $2.5 million on a 30-second slot in 2010.
Their goal was to encourage more Americans to mail in their form, but it’s an insane amount of money that could have been spent helping real Americans with real issues.
Arlington, Virginia decided commuters needed a $1 million fancy bus stop with heated floors and a snazzy digital schedule. Of course, 80% of this luxury came from federal and state funds.
The purpose was to elevate transportation infrastructure, but the “super-stop” didn’t even protect people from the weather. It doesn’t keep commuters warm or dry, so what’s the point?
The U.S. spent $22 million in Serbia, partly to teach locals how to make fancy cheese. Yea, you read that right. The U.S. Agency for International Development used funding to support Serbia’s economic and social improvement.
The rural area Pester was famous for its Sjenica cheese, so the USAID developed a modern cheese production facility and trained staff to make the cheese up to international standards.
We all hate cleaning the toilet, but how much are you willing to spend so that you don’t have to? The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) was willing to spend $500,000 apparently.
At one of its metro stations, the WMATA spent taxpayer dollars to maintain a single self-cleaning toilet. The cherry on top is that the toilet doesn’t even work. It’s been out of commission since 2017.
The NIH gave a total of $817,000 worth of grants to the State University of New York at Buffalo to study monkey drool. The experiment compared human drool to different apes and monkeys in order to investigate the evolution of saliva.
Honestly, this is exactly the type of monkey business we expect the government to be up to at this point. At least it’s somewhat interesting, we guess.
Northwestern University received $3 million to study hamsters fighting. They even used steroid-pumped hamsters to crank up the drama. This epic hamster WWE went on for twenty years, all on the taxpayers’ dime.
The research finally ended in 2017 after animal protection groups protested for years. Maybe next time the cash could go toward something a little more productive than rodent cage matches.
The Department of Health and Human Services allocated $500,000 to help IHOP open a location in Washington, D.C. The purpose was to subsidize pancake breakfasts, hoping to bring in more visitors and help with community engagement.
Yea, this is a nice idea in theory, but it doesn’t really justify the high price tag. There’s no reason to spend taxpayer money on a pancake restaurant instead of addressing more urgent community needs.
